![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
think my money would be on the sti with simple mods like stated but if the boost was turned up on race gas might go either way.
__________________
blew it up , best e.t 12.59 best mph 105.9 20psi mt dr's . 1991 galant vr-4 12.63@109 on 93 |
|
|||
|
Sy's ran a low 13 stock from what I've read, I don't think an STI can pull that off. The other thing is if you cheat and ice the water to air setup on the Sy, no prob. I've got a Sy I/C and I'm gonna use it on a Buick motor in a swap. In addition to an ice bucket. ED:flaked, got my acronyms bass ackwards, thought he said TSI not STI. In need of a brain transplant. STI would be a nasty race regardless of which way you cut it, be a close race regardless in my book.
__________________
89 Astro CS, "In JB Weld we trust" LC2 powered Astro van, give me a few years. |
|
|||
|
Depends on the syclone. Most sti s are good for mid to low 13s right off the dealer floor. While alot of people with sys can or have run these same numbers stock, I hear alot of them can also be in the 14s and 15s. And some of these 14 and 15 second cars are owned by hardcore turbo enthusist who know how to tune and drive. But I'm pulling for the sy with the BPU mods.
__________________
1986 GN 29k og mi gnx rims, 36lb inj hooker headers/full exhaust kn filter |
|
|||
|
Got a Sy with chipping and a Dp that is in the low 12's...not mine, but I have ridden in it several times....The STI would be sent home crying. Oh yeah, thats pump gas too.
__________________
Developing fine hotair GN parts for the masses.....intercoolers are cool! |
|
|||
|
i raced one in oregon that i beleive was stock that went 14.0 and 13.9 .
__________________
blew it up , best e.t 12.59 best mph 105.9 20psi mt dr's . 1991 galant vr-4 12.63@109 on 93 |
|
|||
|
If there is money involved Id buy a ultimate chip, has he done the ic replacement lines, up the timing and race gas. This is for the Sy.
__________________
1994 Impala SS 1993 GMC Typhoon 13.0 @ 102 MPH Stock FYA Motorsports |
|
|||
|
Um guys I hate to break it to you, I am a GM man myself, but i'm pretty sure that any turbo/chip/ic/fuel mod you can do on the sy you can do an equal one on the STI. Sti 's are capable of 12s with the same simple mods as well. But I like the fact they are both awd.
__________________
1986 GN 29k og mi gnx rims, 36lb inj hooker headers/full exhaust kn filter |
|
|||
|
I don't think its a matter of how each responds to "simple" mods, its a matter of how well the mods work...ie, which down pipe is better for that application, which tune is better. There a hundreds of chipping variations for a syclone...which one you chose, or wether you do your own chip is what makes the difference.
__________________
Developing fine hotair GN parts for the masses.....intercoolers are cool! |
|
|||
|
Never owned a Syclone, but love 'em anyways. I do however own an STi. While I don't think the STi is "king of the mountain", stock for stock and with equal drivers, I feel it would be the STi comin' in first. HOWEVER, the STi will NOT respond to simple mods near as well as the Syclone. The STi's ECU is quite finicky. In order to make any serious hp/tq figures, you have to have some form of engine management, which can cost in excess of $1k for a programable/tuneable type. That being said, throw mods at each equally, and w/o engine management, the STi will go down HARD!....
__________________
CURRENT CARS ![]() ![]() -'86 Buick Grand National (9's or bust) -'08 Mazdaspeed 3 -'02 ZO6 PAST CARS -All Mustang GT's: '66, '87, '90, '00, '03, '85, '89 '04 Cobra Vert, '04 Mach I -'04 Subaru WRX STi |
|
|||
|
Also an STi owner, longtime Sy lover. Depending on what mods are done to the STi ~2k (TBE, piggyback, tune) will get into mid 12's. I dont know how well the Sy would go with that, but I do know that the Sy would be cheaper route. BTW: intakes actually slow down the STi. Stock I hit 13.2@101 with the STi. With my set up now I should be low 12's with a tune, new turbo/inj/pump hopefully high 11's.
Nick
__________________
1987 GN 2004 Subaru WRX STi |
|
|||
|
Well my best friend went 12.6 with a FMIC,chip, Fuel pump and CIA. He went mid 13's all day when he was bone stock. Another friend has an STI with a CIA,exhaust and a couple of other little things and has gone like 13.0 flat.
Like was stated the STI's are much less bolt on friendly than the SY/TY's are. $ for $ bolt ons I would take the Syclone everytime.
__________________
Russ 86 GN project rebuilt motor and trans / 206 cam/ GT67 P trim/ Poston headers and crossover/Hooker exhaust/ Halman MBC/EM Alky chip/PTE FMIC/ adj FP/62 Plenum/ RJC plate/ DIY alcohol/THDP/ scanmaster/ 340fp hot wired/ 50lb inj/ still stock D5 converter/Boxed lower CA's/ snubber/ ect 17" Budnik w 315/35/17 DR's. and a shiny new paint job. Someday might get this thing finished, but I doubt it. |
|
|||
|
sti=5 shifts in 1/4 mile. Did you checkout evo vs sti day in englishtown? i was there. STI's got destroyed, why? because even though the sti has more displacement, the knockprone ej25T motor isnt that great. with minor bolt ons, the evo owned the sti. an sti with 420awhp only ran 12.0 thats with an FP green and a 1.7 60foot. meanwhile an evo with 360whp runs 11.805 all day long! anyway, I think the syclone would win. the sti depends on the driver...TMIC=heat soak. the sti is a cool car, but the big flapping wings/hood really hinder it.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|