Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > General Turbo Buick Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 10:28 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norman, Ok
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 88
DirectScan Distance Log Question

I have used DS for approx. 2 years and have never had a problem. However, recently I started paying attention to the "distance" record and I see the numbers (feet) displayed are much less than the actual distance traveled. I noticed this problem when I "zeroed" a 1/4 mile run at the start and 11.8 secs (my track time slip) later the DS log indicated I had traveled 532 feet instead of 1320 feet. I was not expecting 100% accuracy, but this error is huge. I have the correct tire diameter and differential ratio listed in preferences. Have other DS users noticed this error????
__________________
'87 GN - PT 51, Comp Cams 206/206 flat tappet, Champion Irons, Cometics, MSD 50#, Terry Houston down pipe, Extender chip 23*/21*, 3" MAF, Thunderfab 23 row stock location intercooler, Translator +, DIY Alcohol, Walbro 307 w/hot wire, Adj FPR, Big Mouth cold air, Vigilante single disc torque converter, boxed control arms, H-R Swaybar, Omega EGT, Direct Scan, Scnmstr, Innovate LM-1 & LMA-3, M/T 28x9 slicks, 11.499 @ 116.12 mph
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 10:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago-ish
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 622
Does the mile per hour look correct at the top of the run? I've read there is a delay between the trans speed and the ecm through the VSS, but i didnt think it was that bad...
__________________
Steve

'87 GN - Powerlogger/Scanmaster, TT Street Chip, ANS Electronic Boost Controller, PLX M-300 WB, Hot-wired Walbro 340, AlkyControl, Kenne Bell Ram Air, 3" dumped DP, TiAL BOV, TiAL WG and an ESP FMIC...for now...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 10:45 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norman, Ok
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 88
unix punk
No, DS mph shows 107+, the time slip shows 114.85 mph.
__________________
'87 GN - PT 51, Comp Cams 206/206 flat tappet, Champion Irons, Cometics, MSD 50#, Terry Houston down pipe, Extender chip 23*/21*, 3" MAF, Thunderfab 23 row stock location intercooler, Translator +, DIY Alcohol, Walbro 307 w/hot wire, Adj FPR, Big Mouth cold air, Vigilante single disc torque converter, boxed control arms, H-R Swaybar, Omega EGT, Direct Scan, Scnmstr, Innovate LM-1 & LMA-3, M/T 28x9 slicks, 11.499 @ 116.12 mph
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 10:49 AM
BlackBandit's Avatar
God loves Buicks!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Trader Rating: (6)
Posts: 1,753
Have you tried resetting the beginning of the run to match where the run started? Just wondering if your trigger is being triggered before the run.
__________________
Just a simple man from Michigan.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 10:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago-ish
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 622
Or even after the run started for that matter. Good point, Bandit. the distance compared to the mph is way off...unless you really hit 107 at the 500' mark. that could mean that the log started late, your speed will record (almost) correct, but the distance log will be off by alot... Just a guess though.
__________________
Steve

'87 GN - Powerlogger/Scanmaster, TT Street Chip, ANS Electronic Boost Controller, PLX M-300 WB, Hot-wired Walbro 340, AlkyControl, Kenne Bell Ram Air, 3" dumped DP, TiAL BOV, TiAL WG and an ESP FMIC...for now...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 12:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norman, Ok
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 88
bandit & unix
I triggered to start the DS log with the space bar even before the burnout. When reviewing the log, I "zeroed" time at the start of my run (in the log) and the distance also "zeros" automatically. Everthing looks correct (mph is off about 8 mph) from start to finish (11.8 secs. later) except distance.
__________________
'87 GN - PT 51, Comp Cams 206/206 flat tappet, Champion Irons, Cometics, MSD 50#, Terry Houston down pipe, Extender chip 23*/21*, 3" MAF, Thunderfab 23 row stock location intercooler, Translator +, DIY Alcohol, Walbro 307 w/hot wire, Adj FPR, Big Mouth cold air, Vigilante single disc torque converter, boxed control arms, H-R Swaybar, Omega EGT, Direct Scan, Scnmstr, Innovate LM-1 & LMA-3, M/T 28x9 slicks, 11.499 @ 116.12 mph
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 12:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago-ish
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 622
Any chance you have a road by you marked for a 1/4 mile? Maybe you could drive down it normally and log it to see if you get the correct distance in the DS. Other than that i'm stumped unless you mistyped your wheel size and whatnot in there. Any other ideas Bandit?
__________________
Steve

'87 GN - Powerlogger/Scanmaster, TT Street Chip, ANS Electronic Boost Controller, PLX M-300 WB, Hot-wired Walbro 340, AlkyControl, Kenne Bell Ram Air, 3" dumped DP, TiAL BOV, TiAL WG and an ESP FMIC...for now...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 12:52 PM
BlackBandit's Avatar
God loves Buicks!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Trader Rating: (6)
Posts: 1,753
That's a good idea. You could also use a freeway to verify your speedo via milemarkers.
__________________
Just a simple man from Michigan.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2007, 01:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norman, Ok
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 88
Thanks guys,
I have checked and double checked my preferences. If there is a problem with my entries I sure don't see it. I'll try some distance logging and see how it goes.
__________________
'87 GN - PT 51, Comp Cams 206/206 flat tappet, Champion Irons, Cometics, MSD 50#, Terry Houston down pipe, Extender chip 23*/21*, 3" MAF, Thunderfab 23 row stock location intercooler, Translator +, DIY Alcohol, Walbro 307 w/hot wire, Adj FPR, Big Mouth cold air, Vigilante single disc torque converter, boxed control arms, H-R Swaybar, Omega EGT, Direct Scan, Scnmstr, Innovate LM-1 & LMA-3, M/T 28x9 slicks, 11.499 @ 116.12 mph
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DirectScan and Knock Question Lhorn General Turbo Buick Tech 2 October 3rd, 2007 07:53 AM
Directscan (computer question) insane6 Scan Tool Tech 3 October 7th, 2006 11:52 PM
50's for a distance turbo buicks General Turbo Buick Tech 5 September 6th, 2002 01:07 AM
Question about DirectScan ALBERTAN Scan Tool Tech 1 June 10th, 2002 12:06 AM
Directscan question/help Turbonut Scan Tool Tech 2 August 17th, 2001 12:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !