Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > General Turbo Buick Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 9th, 2006, 02:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 214
High vs Low Impedance Injectors

Is there an advantage to using low impedance injectors over high impedance, given two injector rated at the same flow; i.e. 60#?
__________________
1986 GN, T-Tops,16" GNX's, BS3, TE44, wired 340 Walbro, Billet AFP, Auburn posi, K&N, S/S cat back, A-pillar Boost/Knock, 160 stat, Installing soon; 60# Hi-Z's, 3" DP,High Flow Cat, Dutt Neck IC, Complete front end rebuild
1984 GN
1964 Cutlass 455, 4 speed
1964 Cutlass 350/350
1964 Cutlass Convertable 425/400
1999 Chevy Tahoe 2dr 4x4 (ex cop truck)
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic
HadEnoughAlready@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old September 9th, 2006, 04:29 PM
Mechanical Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Terry, MS
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 3,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by MY3TTYPES
Is there an advantage to using low impedance injectors over high impedance, given two injector rated at the same flow; i.e. 60#?
The advantage is that the stock ECM will only do the high impedance injectors without sending it to someone like Bob Baily and having him modify it to work with the low impedance units...... other than that..... no...

IMHO.... I like the Motron 60's....high impedance.... they are "newer technology" if you will.....and work just fine on stock ECM's
__________________
1987 GN

Currently under construction....

Old Parts: 60# injectors, 3" TH DP with test pipe and hooker cat back, Walbro 340 pump, Razor's Alky, TT Chip, 3-1/2" MAF pipe with Big Mouth CA Kit and LS1 MAF, Translator.... yada yada

New parts: Ported heads with stainless valves, RJC FMIC, T&D 1.65 roller rockers, Comp Custom Ground Hydraulic Roller 218/218@.050 .590/.573 (with 1.65 rockers), champion ported intake, Hemco stock appearing doghouse, PT70 P-trim turbo with H comp. housing, N/A109 block bored .030 over with head studs, main studs #2 and #3 billet main caps, cometics, TRW forged .030 over slugs with hastings moly rings.

New times soon.


(1/8) 8.002 @ 86 mph 12.650 @ 106 mph with a 1.71 60' time with the stock turbo/dutt neck intercooler (best mph was 107.69 mph)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 9th, 2006, 05:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazer406
The advantage is that the stock ECM will only do the high impedance injectors without sending it to someone like Bob Baily and having him modify it to work with the low impedance units...... other than that..... no...

IMHO.... I like the Motron 60's....high impedance.... they are "newer technology" if you will.....and work just fine on stock ECM's
Thanks. I wasn't sure if maybe they performed better or had improved spray pattern or something.
__________________
1986 GN, T-Tops,16" GNX's, BS3, TE44, wired 340 Walbro, Billet AFP, Auburn posi, K&N, S/S cat back, A-pillar Boost/Knock, 160 stat, Installing soon; 60# Hi-Z's, 3" DP,High Flow Cat, Dutt Neck IC, Complete front end rebuild
1984 GN
1964 Cutlass 455, 4 speed
1964 Cutlass 350/350
1964 Cutlass Convertable 425/400
1999 Chevy Tahoe 2dr 4x4 (ex cop truck)
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic
HadEnoughAlready@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old September 9th, 2006, 05:52 PM
Mechanical Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Terry, MS
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 3,226
I think the 60# Motrons.... were developed for Mecury Marine.... for outboard engines... but I could be wrong.... I love mine.... even on a stock motor.... just get a turbotweak chip to go with them... and you can't go wrong.... and they are large enough to safely go deep into the 10's....
__________________
1987 GN

Currently under construction....

Old Parts: 60# injectors, 3" TH DP with test pipe and hooker cat back, Walbro 340 pump, Razor's Alky, TT Chip, 3-1/2" MAF pipe with Big Mouth CA Kit and LS1 MAF, Translator.... yada yada

New parts: Ported heads with stainless valves, RJC FMIC, T&D 1.65 roller rockers, Comp Custom Ground Hydraulic Roller 218/218@.050 .590/.573 (with 1.65 rockers), champion ported intake, Hemco stock appearing doghouse, PT70 P-trim turbo with H comp. housing, N/A109 block bored .030 over with head studs, main studs #2 and #3 billet main caps, cometics, TRW forged .030 over slugs with hastings moly rings.

New times soon.


(1/8) 8.002 @ 86 mph 12.650 @ 106 mph with a 1.71 60' time with the stock turbo/dutt neck intercooler (best mph was 107.69 mph)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old September 10th, 2006, 05:32 PM
Sleeper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 673
It used to be that the largest high impedence injectors you could get were 50 lb'ers. Above that, the low Impedence type (Peak and hold) were easier to control, (especially at idle pulse width ie. >2ms) because of the quicker response time. An injector operating on a saturated circuit driver (High impedence) typically has a reaction time of 2 milliseconds, while a peak and hold driver typically responds in 1.5 ms.
The larger newer type injectors have different coils, so the response time is better.

Spray pattern depends on style... Pintle, Disk, Ball and Socket, Radius Rod, Etc

Paul
__________________
1972 Toyota Celica with a 87 TR drive train
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old September 11th, 2006, 12:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeper
It used to be that the largest high impedence injectors you could get were 50 lb'ers. Above that, the low Impedence type (Peak and hold) were easier to control, (especially at idle pulse width ie. >2ms) because of the quicker response time. An injector operating on a saturated circuit driver (High impedence) typically has a reaction time of 2 milliseconds, while a peak and hold driver typically responds in 1.5 ms.
The larger newer type injectors have different coils, so the response time is better.

Spray pattern depends on style... Pintle, Disk, Ball and Socket, Radius Rod, Etc

Paul
I mostly will be daily driving this GN, so low and mid speed are most important to me (for now, that is). What would you say is available/best for unopened motor? What pattern of spray is best? I'm looking for 60# or more.

Ed
__________________
1986 GN, T-Tops,16" GNX's, BS3, TE44, wired 340 Walbro, Billet AFP, Auburn posi, K&N, S/S cat back, A-pillar Boost/Knock, 160 stat, Installing soon; 60# Hi-Z's, 3" DP,High Flow Cat, Dutt Neck IC, Complete front end rebuild
1984 GN
1964 Cutlass 455, 4 speed
1964 Cutlass 350/350
1964 Cutlass Convertable 425/400
1999 Chevy Tahoe 2dr 4x4 (ex cop truck)
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic
HadEnoughAlready@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old September 11th, 2006, 08:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Trader Rating: (4)
Posts: 7,093
SWleeper- do you have any pics of that celica with the turbo drivetrain?
__________________
87 Stage2 in the works!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old September 11th, 2006, 03:37 PM
Sleeper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by MY3TTYPES
I mostly will be daily driving this GN, so low and mid speed are most important to me (for now, that is). What would you say is available/best for unopened motor? What pattern of spray is best? I'm looking for 60# or more.

Ed
Just curious... Looking at your sig, why 60# or larger. If your not planning to do a lot of upgrades or racing, 50's would be more than enough.

As far as spray pattterns go... All of the new stuff is pretty good. I you want more technical details, give Jack at Racetronics a call. He can recommend something to suit your setup and needs.

49-blues
The pic in my avatar is my car.

Paul
__________________
1972 Toyota Celica with a 87 TR drive train
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old September 12th, 2006, 09:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeper
Just curious... Looking at your sig, why 60# or larger. If your not planning to do a lot of upgrades or racing, 50's would be more than enough.

As far as spray pattterns go... All of the new stuff is pretty good. I you want more technical details, give Jack at Racetronics a call. He can recommend something to suit your setup and needs.

49-blues
The pic in my avatar is my car.

Paul
If you look at my sig, you should be asking why "only" 60's? I have a Big Block mentality. I mean, when is enough ever enough? I've always tried to leave room for growth.

Just ordered the 60's from Full Throttle with a new 340 pump to replace the 307 I have now. Sad the THDP's aren't in stock. Hmmm, wonder what mods for the 3 1/2"....

11's are nice, but aren't 10's better?

Thanks for asking, Paul.

Ed
__________________
1986 GN, T-Tops,16" GNX's, BS3, TE44, wired 340 Walbro, Billet AFP, Auburn posi, K&N, S/S cat back, A-pillar Boost/Knock, 160 stat, Installing soon; 60# Hi-Z's, 3" DP,High Flow Cat, Dutt Neck IC, Complete front end rebuild
1984 GN
1964 Cutlass 455, 4 speed
1964 Cutlass 350/350
1964 Cutlass Convertable 425/400
1999 Chevy Tahoe 2dr 4x4 (ex cop truck)
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic
HadEnoughAlready@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old September 13th, 2006, 12:20 AM
Sleeper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto Canada
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 673
I hear you Ed Gofastitus bites us all.

Paul
__________________
1972 Toyota Celica with a 87 TR drive train
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old September 13th, 2006, 04:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,890
Quote:
I have a Big Block mentality. I mean, when is enough ever enough?
When it is almost too much. Would you run a 4" bore in a 109 block? Would you run 50 lbs boost on a 109 block? How about a cam with 250 duration on your turbo Buick? The 60s should be good well into the 10s, per Joe Lubrant's chart at GnTType.org. And that's without going past 90% on the duty cycle, or turning up the fuel pressure past the "normal" range.
__________________
George W
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old September 13th, 2006, 06:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ormand
When it is almost too much. Would you run a 4" bore in a 109 block? Would you run 50 lbs boost on a 109 block? How about a cam with 250 duration on your turbo Buick? The 60s should be good well into the 10s, per Joe Lubrant's chart at GnTType.org. And that's without going past 90% on the duty cycle, or turning up the fuel pressure past the "normal" range.
I noticed you said "almost too much." I can respect what you're saying. And I agree, to a point.

I drove an 84 GN for 13 years with no more than a hi-po fuel pump and a fresh "stock" motor/trans/rear, and some Enki 15"GNX wheels. (I like them) It was (is) a great car but I didn't mod it 'cause of it's rarity (only 2000, remember). I even towed my wifes Accura Integra from FL to CA behind it. It was in service until it was stolen (and recovered). I've since sent it to FL for a rest at my brothers place until I get back to it. I just love the leather seats.

Now I have a mass produced 86 w/ T-Tops (and they're off right now by the way). It's in good shape mostly, and I don't plan to be a "Joe Racer" and will drive it every day until the weather changes. (Advantage CA) The stock injectors were barely enough when new, and now, w/the TE44, no way. Is there that much difference between the 50' and 60's? 95% bigger-110% bigger, do you feel 60's are a mistake? I hope not cause they'll be here friday! Is a 340 pump too much? I just figure that I'll grow into them.

13 years with no mods, don't you think I deserve this, huh?

Thanks for the post, I have enjoyed and learned from them all!
__________________
1986 GN, T-Tops,16" GNX's, BS3, TE44, wired 340 Walbro, Billet AFP, Auburn posi, K&N, S/S cat back, A-pillar Boost/Knock, 160 stat, Installing soon; 60# Hi-Z's, 3" DP,High Flow Cat, Dutt Neck IC, Complete front end rebuild
1984 GN
1964 Cutlass 455, 4 speed
1964 Cutlass 350/350
1964 Cutlass Convertable 425/400
1999 Chevy Tahoe 2dr 4x4 (ex cop truck)
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic
HadEnoughAlready@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old September 13th, 2006, 08:20 PM
bison's Avatar
Long Duc Dong
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Balls deep in CT!
Trader Rating: (23)
Posts: 4,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by MY3TTYPES
I noticed you said "almost too much." I can respect what you're saying. And I agree, to a point.

I drove an 84 GN for 13 years with no more than a hi-po fuel pump and a fresh "stock" motor/trans/rear, and some Enki 15"GNX wheels. (I like them) It was (is) a great car but I didn't mod it 'cause of it's rarity (only 2000, remember). I even towed my wifes Accura Integra from FL to CA behind it. It was in service until it was stolen (and recovered). I've since sent it to FL for a rest at my brothers place until I get back to it. I just love the leather seats.

Now I have a mass produced 86 w/ T-Tops (and they're off right now by the way). It's in good shape mostly, and I don't plan to be a "Joe Racer" and will drive it every day until the weather changes. (Advantage CA) The stock injectors were barely enough when new, and now, w/the TE44, no way. Is there that much difference between the 50' and 60's? 95% bigger-110% bigger, do you feel 60's are a mistake? I hope not cause they'll be here friday! Is a 340 pump too much? I just figure that I'll grow into them.

13 years with no mods, don't you think I deserve this, huh?

Thanks for the post, I have enjoyed and learned from them all!
A single 340 is barely enough for 6 60's at 85% duty cycle if everything is right on through the stock fuel lines. Better opt for that double pumper when you throw on the T70 turbo .
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old September 13th, 2006, 11:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by bison
A single 340 is barely enough for 6 60's at 85% duty cycle if everything is right on through the stock fuel lines. Better opt for that double pumper when you throw on the T70 turbo .
If I even get close to that stage, I'll probably replace the lines with bigger stainless peices. Maybe use the feed line for return. I'm sure that is pretty far down the line though.

Thanks for the advice, Ed

(Hmm...T70....)
__________________
1986 GN, T-Tops,16" GNX's, BS3, TE44, wired 340 Walbro, Billet AFP, Auburn posi, K&N, S/S cat back, A-pillar Boost/Knock, 160 stat, Installing soon; 60# Hi-Z's, 3" DP,High Flow Cat, Dutt Neck IC, Complete front end rebuild
1984 GN
1964 Cutlass 455, 4 speed
1964 Cutlass 350/350
1964 Cutlass Convertable 425/400
1999 Chevy Tahoe 2dr 4x4 (ex cop truck)
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic
HadEnoughAlready@hotmail.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
One of the largest message boards on the web !