Go Back   TurboBuick.Com > Tech Arena > General Turbo Buick Tech
Register FAQ Members List Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read



Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #36 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2005, 12:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Choctaw, Oklahoma
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 209
I am going to chime in and give my 2 cents. This is a little off topic, but I really enjoyed reading this thread, because the quiet stealthy approach of the grand nationals is a big part of why I fell in love with them. I have seen really loud obnoxious v8 cars run 15's in the quarter then I would, see these Grand Nationals where all I could hear was this whistle?, and they would be running 11s. I thought it was the coolest thing in the world and is a big part of the reason I drive 1 now.
__________________
87 Grand National best to date 12.9

86 Wh-1 Astroroof 13.5
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2005, 06:59 AM
Pronto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nashua, NH
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 3,753
Loudness isn't an indicator of performance. Sometimes when I'm in the staging lanes I have to look at my scanmaster just to see if my car is running because I can't hear it over some stupidly loud car in the next lane. I got tired of the constant drone and having to have the radio up too loud just to hear it with my old T/A. Quiet acceleration is one of the best things about TBs.
__________________
87 TurboT--GT6131, 60lb injectors, Precision sl intercooler, Hooker cat back exhaust, THDP, home made Big Mouth, pp, 62mm tb, adj fr, Walbro 340/hotwire, AlkyControl kit, Turbo Tweak 93+alky chip, HR lower control arms, air bags, ATR bar, best et 11.79@113.86
http://s64.photobucket.com/albums/h1...secondpass.flv
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2005, 06:16 PM
The Green BEAST
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver WA.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 664
pictures of his 3 muffler set up

At turbo thunder IV he was nice enough to let me take some pictures of his set up. I wanted the same thing on my car but it would not fit on mine. Hope this helps out. You can pull the part # from the pictures if you want.
Oh one other thing you can't hear it run at all at the track.
Chris
pictures here
__________________
R.I.P.
87 Buick GN motor and trans in a 242 Volvo. 12.59 @ 113
Video

Mods
Postons 202 cam ,TE-62, 3" dp and 3 1/2 exhaust all the way back. p plate , 009s,adj billit top fpr,. Pts shift kit and preasure reg. New TRanny! Ford 8.8 (3.27:1) 11" drums and Powertrax no-slip locker ,Lt1 MAF and Translator + & extender chip
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2005, 11:58 PM
TEST MY 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 506
Thanks for the great pics!!!! I just noted somthing about the 17231 vs the 17276 Besides the 17231 being aluminized its also a 14" muffler rather than the 17276 which is a 20" , I think at this point the extra money is worth it only because it has been used in dennis's car and it simply works. The 17276 is avaiable from summit at 179.95 , If it quiets the car down as people have said than its worth it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2005, 10:15 AM
The Green BEAST
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver WA.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 664
Look how he ran it

From what I rember talking to him about it the exhaust comes over the axles and ----><----- against each other at the top and exits down <--- --->at the bottom. You will have to make sure thats what he did, but I think thats why its so nice. One other thing if you are going to do all this and spend the money mights as well be ss. He also said it was a tight run over the rear axles too. Good luck and let us know how it sounds if at all ..
Chris
__________________
R.I.P.
87 Buick GN motor and trans in a 242 Volvo. 12.59 @ 113
Video

Mods
Postons 202 cam ,TE-62, 3" dp and 3 1/2 exhaust all the way back. p plate , 009s,adj billit top fpr,. Pts shift kit and preasure reg. New TRanny! Ford 8.8 (3.27:1) 11" drums and Powertrax no-slip locker ,Lt1 MAF and Translator + & extender chip
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2005, 12:10 PM
TurboBob's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Commerce Township, Michigan
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,384
the stock exhaust comes over the axle and enters both bottom ports on the muffler --->|____|<---

Then the exhaust exits thru both top ports <---|___|--->

The "Dennis Hogan" exhaust is "top to top", "bottom to bottom"


--->|_____|--->
<---|_____|<---

So it takes a little more work to make it all fit. Plus that larger muffler is a tight fit. It should be well worth it though.....

Bob

Last edited by TurboBob : October 10th, 2005 at 12:11 PM. Reason: fix artwork
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2005, 02:48 PM
TEST MY 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 506
Yup that's it Bob, and I think that because the 17276 is a Straight thru type muffler there will not be much HP loss at all, The Original GN muffler being a true crossflow relies on the gases to find their way thru the chambers/baffles to the lower exit ports and would cause excessive back pressure especially in a high HP application.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2005, 12:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: My kids piggy bank
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 349
Dynomax SS mufflers

If the 17231 and 17276 mufflers are aluminized, does Dynomax have SS versions of the two? If so......part numbers?? Thanks.
__________________
87 GN - daily driver w/roller motor-Suspension guinea pig.
67 Mustang Fastback (Buick Eater)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2005, 01:06 PM
TurboBob's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Commerce Township, Michigan
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,384
17276 Stainless, 20" case

17231 Aluminized, 14" case
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2005, 03:55 PM
I was here first
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ClintonTwp Mi
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 2,301
Bob how did I know you would be in this thread?
Bigger case volume = quieter
Mike
__________________
www.fullthrottlespeed.com
Tech:www.fullthrottletech.com
Home of the FASTEST hydraulic roller cams for Turbo Buicks
___________________________________________
Disclaimer:
The poster does not take any responsibility for any bad feelings or sense of exclusion that the reader of this post may have-whether real or imagined. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster of this thread would like to also remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor and a brain before they visit any discussion board
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2005, 09:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CC-TX.
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 228
I hope this helps your choice. I have a dual 3" system made from an exhaust shop. I had turbo mufflers on it and I didnt like the way it sounded. We cut these out and put straight pipes. It was VERY loud. I just put in 3" Dynomax Ultraflows. Man did it quite the car down that I can actually hear everything else now. Get the Ultraflows or the Magnaflows, they both have the same design. You will not be dissapointed if you get these mufflers unless you want it to be loud. If you want it to be loud, get something else.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2005, 06:00 AM
What?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACK DEATH DSR
Get the Ultraflows or the Magnaflows
Quiet is somewhat relative. I'd venture to say that the people on this thread want it even quieter than the ultraflows. I had ultraflows and the aerochambers I have now are even quieter. I still want something even quieter hence the desire for the third "big case" freeflowing muffler in the stock location.
__________________
1987 Grand National -> 11.81@117.8mph...93+alky thru the cat w/ a TA49
2005 Subaru Forester XT
2007 TB SS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old October 13th, 2005, 08:19 PM
TEST MY 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 506
well I orderd the 17276 but my plans to see the exhaust guy wil have to wait till next saturday due to the rain that hasnt stopped here for like 5 days .
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old October 13th, 2005, 09:46 PM
TurboBob's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Commerce Township, Michigan
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,384
I had dual ultraflows, and then switched to aerochambers. I also installed three borla venturis and a flexible test pipe, and I have installed frame braces. All in the name of reducing drone. Still too loud and "droney".

On the 17276, please take a ton of pics! I have a shop that has said they would tackle it, but all available pics would be a great help.

Bob
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old October 13th, 2005, 09:47 PM
TurboBob's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Commerce Township, Michigan
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,384
Anyone tried the "tailpipe slots" that were posted a few years ago?

Bob
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old October 14th, 2005, 11:35 AM
TEST MY 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 506
The finish is almost chrome like and the design is 2.5" straight thru .
Attached Images
     
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old October 14th, 2005, 11:40 AM
TurboBob's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Commerce Township, Michigan
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,384
excellent
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old October 14th, 2005, 12:06 PM
What?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 866
Pictures of the final product with the axle hump and tail pipes and all fab'd up would be cool too.
__________________
1987 Grand National -> 11.81@117.8mph...93+alky thru the cat w/ a TA49
2005 Subaru Forester XT
2007 TB SS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old October 14th, 2005, 01:14 PM
The Green BEAST
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver WA.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 664
This would be good sticky I think

Quote:
Originally Posted by stickybones
Pictures of the final product with the axle hump and tail pipes and all fab'd up would be cool too.
I know there have been a lot of people wanting a set up just like this and ask for it a lot. If you had Lots of pics of the build and final set up I am sure you could get maybe one of the other sites to post it, if you do a small write up. Also giving credit were needed too.
Chris
__________________
R.I.P.
87 Buick GN motor and trans in a 242 Volvo. 12.59 @ 113
Video

Mods
Postons 202 cam ,TE-62, 3" dp and 3 1/2 exhaust all the way back. p plate , 009s,adj billit top fpr,. Pts shift kit and preasure reg. New TRanny! Ford 8.8 (3.27:1) 11" drums and Powertrax no-slip locker ,Lt1 MAF and Translator + & extender chip
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old October 14th, 2005, 04:15 PM
TEST MY 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 506
Ill do my best , The exhaust guy im going to see has done some nice stuff from what ive been told and I have seen a dual 3" setup on a late model F-body that he did, He said to me " i hate to sound cocky but I can do anything" LOL well see
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote