![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
What pistons needed for stroker motor
What is the proper pin height or comp height needed for the new stroker kits with 3.625" crank and 6.00" K1 rods(or are they actually 5.960"-5.970")?im building a 4.1 production block stroker motor and need the correct pistons to use. Or would i need a different length rod? thanks for any input.
__________________
87 Stage2 in the works! Last edited by 49-blues : June 4th, 2007 at 07:54 AM. Reason: So it doesnt look like im looking to buy parts |
|
|||
|
what bore size are you after?
Mike
__________________
www.fullthrottlespeed.com Tech:www.fullthrottletech.com Home of the FASTEST hydraulic roller cams for Turbo Buicks ___________________________________________ Disclaimer: The poster does not take any responsibility for any bad feelings or sense of exclusion that the reader of this post may have-whether real or imagined. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster of this thread would like to also remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor and a brain before they visit any discussion board |
|
|||
|
That is .035 over. We are deciding right now on doing a 4.1 stroker piston to offer as an option but the oversizes are all over the place and I can only do two sizes I was thinking 3.985 and 3.995 but I wil check the to see if there is a difference in price for the 4" since is is so common the ring may be a bit less. I just have not bored enough production block to see how they stand up at .035
Mike
__________________
www.fullthrottlespeed.com Tech:www.fullthrottletech.com Home of the FASTEST hydraulic roller cams for Turbo Buicks ___________________________________________ Disclaimer: The poster does not take any responsibility for any bad feelings or sense of exclusion that the reader of this post may have-whether real or imagined. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster of this thread would like to also remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor and a brain before they visit any discussion board |
|
|||
|
Wouldnt a 3.995" piston in a 4.00" bore have .005" wall clearance- shouldnt that be about right for a forged piston expansion ? I for one would definently be interested in say a Diamond piston in that size. What would the required pin or comp height be? Mike- did you ever get that stage2 headed production block finished? if so how did it work out?
__________________
87 Stage2 in the works! |
|
|||
|
Bore size
Back 11-12 years ago, when I built my first production 4.1. I got the pistons from Duttwieler. 4.00" was what he recommended boring it too, and only sold pistons for that bore size.
__________________
Grey 87 Turbo-T 11.07@125 (should be stage II by end of summer) White 87 Turbo-T (bought it apart, slowly getting it put back together) 86 GN (backhalf project) 89 TTA 02 Crewcab dually w/ the 8100 & 5 speed Allison auto. |
|
|||
|
I have only built a few but they all ran very well a couple cracked from the head bolt hole to the water jacket and this is a weak point of that block. I know a 274 with some iron heads, a smaller cam a 67 turbo and 3000 stall would be a ton of fun on the street.
Mike
__________________
www.fullthrottlespeed.com Tech:www.fullthrottletech.com Home of the FASTEST hydraulic roller cams for Turbo Buicks ___________________________________________ Disclaimer: The poster does not take any responsibility for any bad feelings or sense of exclusion that the reader of this post may have-whether real or imagined. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster of this thread would like to also remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor and a brain before they visit any discussion board |
|
|||
|
YES, it is worth it. One thing I think is absolutely necessary, and the reason mine has taken so much abuse for so long is Hard Blok. I half filled the water jackets. Yes, I drive it on the street with no heating problems. I feel that Hard Blok should always be used when building a 4.1. If interested, let me know and I'll tell how I did it.
Brandon
__________________
Grey 87 Turbo-T 11.07@125 (should be stage II by end of summer) White 87 Turbo-T (bought it apart, slowly getting it put back together) 86 GN (backhalf project) 89 TTA 02 Crewcab dually w/ the 8100 & 5 speed Allison auto. |
|
|||
|
Block needs to be as clean as possible. Oven baked and shot blasted is the best. The shop I used for this closed up about 4 years ago.
Anyway, I'm sure a few went when I mentioned half fill the water jackets! And some may also realize that a half fill is above the water pump port in the block. This is the difficult part. Originally, I used modeling clay to form and maintain a waterpump port. The problem is removing the clay once the Hard Blok has set up. It's a real PITA to get it all out. I've got a new idea to use a hose, but haven't tried it yet. I got to looking at some of my old notes and pictures and I built my first prod. 4.1 14 years ago. I put steel mains on it back then too. I cut down 4-bolt main caps to fit the 2-bolt registers. This was several years before they were available from the venders. The rest was just good madhining practices. IMO the Hard Blok makes a huge difference. I wouldn't build another one without it. Oh, I almost forgot. You need to drill the little steam holes between the cylinders, like the stageII 4.1. This is outlined in the Buick Power Source book. You will have heating issues without the steam holes. If you have more questions let me know.HTH some, Brandon
__________________
Grey 87 Turbo-T 11.07@125 (should be stage II by end of summer) White 87 Turbo-T (bought it apart, slowly getting it put back together) 86 GN (backhalf project) 89 TTA 02 Crewcab dually w/ the 8100 & 5 speed Allison auto. |
|
|||
|
IMHO, I would deck the block first then bore the block within .005" of the bore size. Then I would order the pistons. There are too many variables in pre-ordering piston sizes. Prior to ordering pistons, you are going to need deck height, rod length, cc of the heads, compression ratio you want, etc, etc, etc. There are too many variable in pre-ordering pistons, all motors are not the same.
Billy T. gnxtc2@aol.com |
|
|||
|
Quote:
3.625 Stroke 6 inch Rod with .927 Pin. What is your set up how much Compression are you running? What Brand of Piston do you have How much did they Cost? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
3.625 Stroke 6 inch Rod with .927 Pin. What is your set up how much Compression are you running? What Brand of Piston do you have How much did they Cost? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FullThrottles Stroker kits, any machining needed to be done? | jdpolzin | General Turbo Buick Tech | 1 | January 30th, 2007 07:49 AM |
| FS: 1986 Roller and Stroker 4.1 Stage 1 motor | gnxs | Cars for sale | 16 | December 2nd, 2006 10:06 AM |
| Selection help needed (Pistons) | slamming 6 | Stage II Tech | 8 | April 27th, 2006 10:48 PM |
| Pistons Needed | Jay Wicks | Stage II Tech | 1 | July 28th, 2005 04:46 PM |
| (2) 3.8 030 pistons needed | chris | Parts wanted | 2 | May 25th, 2005 05:10 PM |