![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the TurboBuick.Com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
R / A 's 009 chips
anybody using Reds chips for 009's ? wondering if they got the handle on the tip in. and generally if your satisfied with chip / inj combo
__________________
87 GN mostly stock |
|
||||
|
Yep, I used them and no tipin stumble they worked great! I recommend them.. I stepped up to the MEffort tho..
ks ![]()
__________________
Tech Page,~~Launching a Drag Car,~~BaselineSuspensions.com~ ~Project F150~ Suspension Moderator @ Hardcore50 Diary of a GN 87 GN 12.05 @ 111, 1.60 60', 15psi launch New mods: 12.16 @ 109- Best 60' 1.60 @ 22-23psi Stock Turbo Stock IC w/ stock neck MaxEffort |
|
|||
|
thanks for the replys guys. currently using lubrant 110 which for the most part seems to work ok, has a slight tip in stumble. only asked about the R/A chips because I have a couple of stock inj chips lying around which could be updated fairly cheep.
__________________
87 GN mostly stock |
|
||||
|
What times are you running with that 44 and 009's?
__________________
Jorge P. 1986 GN -->Daily Driver, 168,000 Original Miles High 11's... in both ET and MPG. Shooting for 10's this year "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." Mr. Ziglar |
|
|||
|
launched about 2lbs and 22lbs through the traps. I don't frequent the track that often just two or three times a year, need to work on that launch.
__________________
87 GN mostly stock |
|
||||
|
where did you get the 44 jorge???...
...you dog... ![]()
__________________
Shawn - over 750 Turbo Buick articles on 13 CD-ROMs!!! NEW - 80's G-body 442 and Hurst / Olds on CD-ROM!!! Four boys. ![]() All four in baseball and two in the scouts! = Two cars I don't work on: 1987 Buick GN - Daily Driver 1985 Olds 442 - lowrider under restoration and for sale Wifes cars: 1997 Chevy full size conversion van. 1993 Jeep Wrangler. you really should buy something: http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/h/shawnco/...le/forsale.htm aluminum brake drums, aluminum bumper supports, 34-36mm hollow front anti-swaybars, 83-84 style Hurst / Olds rear spoilers
|
|
|||
|
I have tried Reds 93 and 100 chip programs for 009s.
The 93 program was fat at idle. Produced BLM numbers in the high 90's at 44psi of fuel pressure. The O2's at WOT were in the mid-700's at that pressure at 17psi of boost. So I agree with TurboJorge about it being too fat on bottom and too lean on top. The 100 program is a slightly different animal that I have not ran much yet. The 27° of base timing scares me with this chip! The little bit I drove around with it gave me these impressions -- the bottom is still rich and the timing makes the car MOVE OUT pretty impressively. I plan to treat it like a race chip next time it goes in the car. Running 110 octane fuel only.HTH |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Car is running really stong! Later Dude. |
|
|||
|
I ran 11.62@114.0 with reds 100 chip(009). It REALLY liked the alky injection(SMC). Drivability was excellent, except it was sluggish when cold(initial startup) Red said he intenionaly set the fuel map rich to help with engine durability.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|