View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old December 5th, 2003, 04:10 PM
Gary Wells Gary Wells is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: long Beach, PRK.
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 5,623
FWIW & IMHO:
ohhh, I have to disagree with some of the comments being said here regarding a comparision of the 2 tires in question.
I thought the same thing regarding this question here up until I bought a pristine, showroom condition, garaged its whole life '87 Turbo-T about 3 months age with about 8.4K miles on the clock.
I had at that time another '87 Turbo-T with 117K miles on the clock that I had been using as a daily driver. It was shoed with a brand new set of GTII'S. Both are now and were at the time I owned both bone stock. I hate to say it but the car with the GTII'S handled slightly better, especially in the corners. The car with the original GT'S seemed like the tires were not quite as stiff,especially on the sidewalls as the GTII'S. Just my opinion, but I did drive both during the week for about 3 months to work up until I sold the one with 117K miles to a friend
However, in straight line acceleration, maybe the original GT'S bit better, but I do like the GTII'S over the originals for most applications.
__________________
TIA: Gary Wells / "TOLTK"
'87 Buick Turbo Regal, 22K miles
'02 Quicksilver Z06 Vette, 55K miles
'98 Honda CBR1100XX, 1.2K miles
Garage prostitutes, to the max

Last edited by Gary Wells : December 5th, 2003 at 04:14 PM.
Reply With Quote