View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old November 10th, 2003, 11:09 PM
Eric Stage I Eric Stage I is offline
TurboTweak Guy
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Salem, Illinois
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 953
Carl,
I guess I was thinking that dropping the PE vs. TPS table would allieviate the need for any "negative" trim. Whereas now, if I set the whole PE vs. TPS table to 50%, then I have put -50% in the lower PE vs. RPM ranges to get back to a "normal" A/F.

For the 72's, I was assuming PE A/F vs coolant at 14.0, no TPS trim, MAF pegged at 255, PE vs RPM at 200%. This should give a commanded A/F of about 4.6 (I know, not real). That should calculate out to a pw of about 26.6 at 4800rpm. (There are other things that will affect it, but you get the idea.)

Eric
Reply With Quote