Quote:
Originally Posted by a trail rider
Ahhh yes... You STILL have all the answers, even though you don't yet undertand the questions...
You know this, you know that... How about answering with just a little truth and reality?
Telling us, "The fix is in" without providing a single bit of evidence as to how you could make such a conclusion is like saying you just looked and knew how to tie your shoes instinctively. It isn't true, but you can make the claim anyway.
These "secret energy meetings" must not be very secretive... Or how would you know about them? And if you know about them, why don't you have any details?
|
the evidence is there. You just discount it. When Bush got into office in Jan 2001, there was no talk of Alqueda or OBL despite Dick Clarke's pleas, they talked about invading Iraq. Then after 9 11 Bush kept telling YOU that he hadnt made a decision yet, but the downing street memo proves that he had, and the facts were being fixed around the policy.
The way I look at you is someone who believes everything the republicans say without question, and discount everything the democrats say.
When you should be looking at what they do, not what they say, and look at the underlying issues.
Its shocking that a republican can accept that organized crime is attracted to where the money is, EXCEPT with regard to Iraq, for some reason organized crime has no interest in 100s of billions of dollars.
Where there is money to be made, there is corruption. doenst matter which party it is