View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old June 18th, 2008, 03:29 PM
meanchicken's Avatar
meanchicken meanchicken is offline
Will beg for quarters...
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So Cali
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 1,055
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuickBuick87 View Post
Must be a ringer....... They run about a 13.2-13.5 acording to most car mags i've read. Can't see them being a half second faster then a lighter SRT Challenger??

Ken B.
They actually are pretty close in weight.

I think the 300C is listed at 4175 and the Challenger is at 4150.

They both list with a 4.9 0-60.

It's probably in the way he launched and 60ft'd. Launch hard and minimize the wheel spin and maybe you could out pull the "pro" driver at the factory test course.
Some good weather.
Some good track conditions.
Some good high octane fuel.

Only the timeslip will tell.
Post it! Post it! Post it!
;-)
__________________
87 Grand National: Czarnota built V6 (208/208 cam); 3200 billet 10" lock-up stall; street/strip 200R4 courtesy of Lou and his guy; Precision TA-61 (Thanks Spoolfool2); 3" THDP; TT Alky chip with 60# inj; Hotwired Walbro; ScanMaster 2.1; Adj WG actuator; AFPR; 160* stat; RJC Power Plate; Alkycontrol; TRC Big Mouth cold air kit; Eastern Performance FMIC; Hooker cat back with test pipe; Direct Scan; and a boost gauge Otherwise bone stock.
www.turbolou.com

68 SS Camaro: ZZ502; TKO-600; Moser 12-bolt; Global West tubular control arms, QA1 coil overs; SSBC power disks; quick ratio steering; Hotchkis sway bar; solid body mounts; Be Cool radiator; Pertronix ignition; other stuff; I don't have the timeslip to prove it yet...but...I bet you a dollar it does 11's.
Reply With Quote